On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Another "problem" are build timeouts. We had just last week a package on > crest that had hit the timeout twice (raised in between of course), because > crest was as usually loaded. There's surely a correlation between load > average and build times and therefore this relates to build timeouts as > well. I don't see how you would want to implement that reasonably, but if you can, sounds good. > Just as a third example, the current system is quite static. Packages are > distributed by the queue order, when the buildd itself doesn't have a packages > in one of its skip lists. Packages can not be raised in priority (or > lowered) when needed. If that would ever be necessary, we could always manually build packages. I don't think it's a problem. -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
Description: Digital signature