Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't beingaccepted.
* Ingo Juergensmann (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040219 13:25]:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:42:23PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If this is the case, it should be IMHO be considered to change the
> > interface to w-b from now via command line (means: access via ssh is
> > necessary) to something via a SMTP-like protocol.
> > Of course, this change is not too easy, but if it would lower the risk
> > of problems on ftp-master and would make it more easy to add new
> > buildds, than we should do that change (and I'm willing to put time in
> > that if necessary).
> A new buildd system is a good thing at all, because there are several
> drawbacks that can be solved this way. Implementing a new security model is
> one of the drawbacks.
What other problems can / should be solved?
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C