Re: ntp 4.2.0 in experimental
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 10:39:50PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hmm. I don't think I fall into either category. I have large numbers
> of Debian servers which all use Kerberos, which means they all run ntp.
> We run a single ntp server locally, that all the other machines point
> at; since being in sync with the KDC is more important here than being
> precisely in sync with the outside world, this provides a comparatively
> reliable method of achieving this goal. It reduces the load we impose
> on busy public NTP servers, and there's been minimal need for config
> customization (firewalls can take care of most such issues).
> Which group would you classify our site in?
It sounds like they should re-introduce debconf, but with a
"low" priority to the question. The default answer, of course, would be