Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 04:10:29PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:57:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>>> For example with the arm/mipsel problems I
>>> would have known why the buildds weren't building KDE packages for a
>>> month, and could have probably already uploaded KDE 3.2.0 by now.
>> ] --- Day changed Fri Jan 30 2004
>> ] [...]
>> ] 15:33 <aj> calc: upload it to experimental now instead; that way you get the
>> ] NEW processing out of the way now
>> ] 15:33 <calc> aj: i will as soon as i have some reasonably ready ones,
>> ] probably tomorrow
>> ] 15:34 <calc> well ~ 12hrs from now anyway
>> ] 15:34 <aj> calc: (err, "you can ..", not "please do .." necessarily)
>> Uploading KDE 3.2.0 to unstable isn't the right thing to do when it's
>> likely to have RC bugs and cause us lots of problems trying to release;
>> uploading it to experimental doesn't affect the autobuilders in any
>> way. I don't see why you think blaming the buildds makes any sense.
> We want kde 3.2.0 in sid so it is (tried to be) autobuild. Having it
> in experimental for the one arch the maintainer has will not solve the
> RC bugs that might show up on the other archs.
It will help finding the (RC) bugs on the the arch maintainer has.