Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
- From: smurfd <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:43:54 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1075859008.3579.15.camel@cheetah>
- In-reply-to: <1074732491.12018.42.camel@cheetah>
- References: <20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1074706316.11461.16.camel@cheetah> <email@example.com> <1074732491.12018.42.camel@cheetah>
tor 2004-01-22 klockan 01.48 skrev smurfd:
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 22:42, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 04:31, smurfd <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > > Also note that GRSecurity conflicts with many other kernel patches, so
> > > > including it in the standard kernel source will be unpopular with the
> > > > maintainers of most other kernel patches.
> > >
> > > Well.. thats a big drawback, that the patches conflict with each other.
> > > But, its because they try to patch the kernel on same places, and then
> > > the patch recognises, that there is not the original code, right? .
> > Right. Also it's not just that the patch utility can't find the context, it's
> > that variables are renamed, new functions are added, and the code just has to
> > be changed to match.
> > > Im not sure if i know how/what to do, though.
> > > i mean, patching a kernel, and packaging it... wouldnt be, too hard i
> > > guess.. but solving those kernel-patch-conflicts.. i dont know how to
> > > do.
> > You just need to be a really good C programmer and have a few hours to spare
> > every time a new kernel is released.
> okidoki. Seems like alot of work though.
> Well im throwing up a chroot as we speak, so that i will probably look
> into the work at hand in this weekend or so.. and will get back to see
> if im capable or not..
> Hmm.. when i come to think about it, its "basicly", "just" merge:ing the
> diff files for 2 (or more patches)
> Though, the patches that is spoken about is HUGE.
> Well we will se..
> Best regards
> smurfd <email@example.com>
> aka Nicklas Boman
Okey, have had a look and, yes, they where huge patches.. so alot of
time will be needed, time that i dont have for the moment..
The university is pretty time-consuming..
will probably calm down in about 2 weeks or so..
Mean while at school, i had another idea.. wich could be a great thing
Something similar to the Harden packages, but say, a "harden-kernel"
package, wich will, install a kernel-source, and you get to choose from
the available securityrelated kernel patches..
* grsecurity or
* adamantix or
* etc etc..
Just an idea, thought i share it..
aka Nicklas Boman