[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:10:36AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> [Certainly there are configuration tweaks that could be made to improve
> elinks on debian, but in general it seems to have a far more
> approachable UI than w3m.]

I concur.  I can't figure out w3m at all.  But then again I've been 
using Linux for a year and I still prefer nano.  I "learned" vi but 
never "learned to love it", and couldn't even get passed the smelly long 
hair in emacs.

Reply to: