Re: gcc as optional
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:37:08AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I think we should not to do things by halves. When such service
> (pre-installed compiler) is provided for the users, it should also be
> ready for basic tasks (compile kernel modules or a new kernel, for
> example). I think this all should be moved into an extra task.
Compiling a kernel is not `a basic task'. Compiling userspace programs,
however, might be.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: