Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Thanks for your quick reply.
"H. S. Teoh" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:58:33AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I looked through the differences between testing and unstable and
> > picked out everything older than 100 days. Reasons why those packages
> > are not in testing are:
> > - non-free / contrib packages nobody tried to compile
> > - FTBFS or RC bugs
> > - possibly failure of the testing script to detect it
> > - other packages hold you back (get involved in those other packages)
> > If you maintain one of thses packages then tell me (including the
> > names of packages you maintain) during the next week. If you are using
> > one of these packages and could maintain (or NMU some fixes) you
> > should contact the maintainer and me to work things out. If I hear
> > nothing about a package soon I will start with the oldest and do a few
> > packages every day.
> Please leave axe alone. I am trying to get it built for the architectures
> it is out-of-date on.
Arm, IA64 and sparc buildd admins don't have the email addresses set
Gerhard Tonn <email@example.com> is running the s390 buildd. If you ask
him or Bastian Banks (waldi on irc) nicely they can help you build for
s390. There is also a s390 emulator you can run on your pc. It might
not be the fastest but still faster than looking for someone to build
the package for every upload.