Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
* Brett Cundal (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040127 02:25]:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:58:33AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Noone has cared enough about these packages to get them compiled,
> > fixed or pushed into sarge so I am assuming the packages don't have a
> > caring maintainer or fan community. Ergo they should be orphaned.
> > ghemical gnews gnome-pim gnu-smalltalk gnumach gnumach1 gnuyahoo gpcl
> > gspy gtkam guile-oops gwydion-dylan
> I maintain gnu-smalltalk, but noone seems interested in sponsoring an
> upload for me. My regular sponsor has not been able to do an upload in
> ages. Requests for a new sponsor have gone unanswered.
I'd sponsor it, if you create an up-to-date version of this package
(that also closes all RC-bugs on it).
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C