Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Brett Cundal <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:58:33AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Noone has cared enough about these packages to get them compiled,
> > fixed or pushed into sarge so I am assuming the packages don't have a
> > caring maintainer or fan community. Ergo they should be orphaned.
> > ghemical gnews gnome-pim gnu-smalltalk gnumach gnumach1 gnuyahoo gpcl
> > gspy gtkam guile-oops gwydion-dylan
> I maintain gnu-smalltalk, but noone seems interested in sponsoring an
> upload for me. My regular sponsor has not been able to do an upload in
> ages. Requests for a new sponsor have gone unanswered.
> There is interest in the package... I've been contacted by several
> people regarding the status of this package, but unfortunately none of
> them were DDs.
> If anyone *is* interested in doing an upload, please contact me for
> -- Brett
Thanks for the quick reply.
On the off chance I come accross any DD with smalltalk knowledge I
will point him your way.