[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?

On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 20:35, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

> *  (Enrico Zini)
> | Well, one of the reasons for thinking about dividing the archive in big
> | chunks was, if I'm not mistaken, being able to release the base system
> | more often (and possibly maintain security support for more older
> | versions).
> FWIW, I know a few people now leaving RedHat (since it'll be too
> expensive) for Debian since we aren't on an as aggressive release
> schedule as, say, Fedora.  I wish we released a little more often, but
> every not too often either.
I quite admire the way GNOME are doing releases these days; "we release
on this date, if your code isn't in, it's in the next release."

Seems to be working well for them.

Scott  `-  
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: