Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?

[zinie@cs.unibo.it (Enrico Zini)]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> And assume some important piece of hardware in a server requires a new 
> major release of the kernel (e.g. currently 2.6): You might have to wait 
> many years until the next base system with support for this kernel will 
> be available before you can install Debian on your brand-new server.

Well, one of the reasons for thinking about dividing the archive in big
chunks was, if I'm not mistaken, being able to release the base system
more often (and possibly maintain security support for more older
versions).

Ciao,

Enrico