Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line

To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:10:28 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87oet01q2j.fsf@jidanni.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1074474443.2409.5.camel@thanatos.hubertnet> (Thomas Hood's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 02:07:23 +0100")
References: <E1AhFkw-0000qw-RJ@jidanni.org> <20040118121444.GA11202@downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 877jzpynqk.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 1074474443.2409.5.camel@thanatos.hubertnet>

T> A parallelizing run-parts is the right way to implement this.

Actually, some exceptions: I was thinking about running chrony type
things first before the others clog the line

T> I can send you my latest experimental package to play with if you
T> want.  Just ask.

Way over my head.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

References:
- some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
  - From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ?
Next by Date: Re: new portmap packages, testers wanted
Previous by thread: Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
Next by thread: Re: some /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ scripts don't background, hogging the whole line
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread