Re: A More Radical Multi-Arch Counter-Proposal
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:30:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> John Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Is that not short-sighted? I already posted examples where multiple
> > 32-bit architectures could be in use, for example. If we are going to
> > the effort of making this support possible, why do we not do so in a
> > more inclusive way, at little additional expense?
> You can think of something more or better but changing what has been
> set for years will be realy hard. You have to get every other linux
> distribution (or at least a majority) to agree on any change so good
Couldn't that be fixed by a simple symlink from what the other guys do
to what we do on the effected archs?