[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: util-linux seems to have /sbin/fsck

In article <[🔎] 20040111193033.GA17753@deprecation.cyrius.com>,
Martin Michlmayr  <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
>* Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
>[2004-01-11 19:18]:
>> > I think /sbin/fsck must be packed in not e2fsprogs but util-linux,
>> > 
>> > How do you think about that? Is it bug?
>> Sounds like a reasonable suggestion.
>#111651: fsck: split out from e2fsprogs?

e2fsprogs and e2fslibs together are ~ 1 MB. Isn't splitting out
fsck from that just creating packages for the sake of creating
packages ?


Reply to: