[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Attempted Progress Report: Sarge

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:07:16AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:25:03PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And these changes all qualify as being "major"?
> > 
> > I think the last *major* toolchain change was the addition of the
> > linux-kernel-headers package.  TTBOMK, everything since then has been
> > necessary tweaks.
> Any gcc update can be major since it tends to break various things. On
> Dec 29 gcc-3.3 was synced up with cvs again. Luckily I haven't seen any
> breakage caused by it. However, I am pretty certain that
> linux-kernel-headers was what broke some ugly KDE code, which happened
> to be easy to fix.

All the recent linux-kernel-headers changes you were talking about
earlier have been *fixes* to the problems you're now complaining about,
and don't appear to have introduced any new problems. They aren't major

Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: