Re: Controlling what's in the archive (Re: MIA, Incompetent and holiday-loving maintainers)
> > Requiring co-maintainers would be an overkill. There are quite a few
> > packages where it would be a big burden and wouldn't accomplish anything
> > (think most of my packages: tama, sam, now es). Some packages are so
> > small and simple that requiring co-maintainers for them is just a PITA.
>
> Requiring co-maintainers may be overkill for some packages, but having
> a dedicated backup who you trust to do updates when you're busy|away
> doesn't hurt, does it?
/me wonders who would volunteer to be tama backup ^_^"
Other than that, I agree wholeheartedly.
--
_A/
Reply to: