Ervin Hearn III dijo [Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:27:48PM -0400]: > > > > And as aptitude is kinda useable it might > > > >well replace dselect as the recommended method. > > > > > > Please don't do this yet, since dselect is still more self-documenting, > > > and therefore easier for new people to use. :-P > > > > Easier for new people to use?!? > > > > /me rolls off chair laughing. > > > > I sincerely hope the ":-P" means you are using sarcasm. > > > > Quite seriously, I prefer using dselect... the main complaint > I've heard from new users is being able to search for a specific > package quickly. As soon as I teach them about / for find and > \ for find again, they generally find it just as useful as I do. ...This is just a 'me too' for Evin's position... I am very fond of dselect's way of organizing its listings. Maybe we should ask the user at first boot if he wishes to use tasksel, dselect, aptitude or none-of-the-above, instead of going just tasksel and dselect... But, yes, that would increase the footprint of our base system. And I don't know if we want to support users using by default different package manages :) Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.cx - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature