Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:38:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030909233804.GA13078@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030909222741.GC31610@guildenstern.dyndns.org>
References: <uiun0dv1n94.fsf@echo.linpro.no> <20030827104434.GA25552@pol.ac.uk> <uiuy8xftjtb.fsf@echo.linpro.no> <20030827123215.GA14706@projectcolo.org.uk> <87brub1c5t.fsf@home.killeri.net> <[🔎] 877k4pj82z.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no> <[🔎] 1062664320.12033.185.camel@plaza.davidnicol.com> <[🔎] 20030909222741.GC31610@guildenstern.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:27:41PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Try again.

Please don't.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgpbu5cjBPwZt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
- Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
  - From: david nicol <davidnicol@pay2send.com>
- Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: music sheet
Next by Date: Re: Bug#209693: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Previous by thread: Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
Next by thread: Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken (RAPNAP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread