Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:01:24 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 877k4pj82z.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87brub1c5t.fsf@home.killeri.net> (Kalle Kivimaa's message of "Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:07:58 +0300")
- References: <uiun0dv1n94.fsf@echo.linpro.no> <20030827104434.GA25552@pol.ac.uk> <uiuy8xftjtb.fsf@echo.linpro.no> <20030827123215.GA14706@projectcolo.org.uk> <87brub1c5t.fsf@home.killeri.net>
* Kalle Kivimaa
| And yes, I'm actually considering filing grave bugs against each
| such list software package (I'm willing to live with such behaviour
| being optional with the default being no response, if the
| documentation says "beware SPAM worms if you enable autoresponse).
Please file a wishlist bug against mailman to change the default for
sending a response when holding a message.
(The feature is there, it's optional, but after seeing your argument,
I agree that the default should be changed.)
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: