Re: Announcing type-handling
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:49:00PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> How does "dpkg-type" sound to you?
Is this kludge realy considered to be a official package handling tool? Iff
it should be named after dpkg, then it should be integrated in dpkg by
exending the syntax opposed to generate virtual packages.
It is somewhat sad that such solutions have to be done as a workaround, even
if we have the source to fix it. This just feels all wrong to me.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Wendelinusstrasse39.76646Bruchsal.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD eckes@irc +497257930613 BE5-RIPE
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Reply to: