Hi,
Alexander Sack wrote:
> |
> | a) mozilla-browser, mozilla-browser-snapshot, mozilla-thunderbird
> | and openoffice.org provide myspell-spellchecker
> |
> | b) the myspell-* packages recommend myspell-spellchecker
> |
>
> what will you get from this??
> OK. You will be enabled to get all myspell enabled applications. If
> this is in general desirable, than such a policy would make sense.
That is my opinion ;)
> Personally I never felt the need to get all myspell-spellchecker
> enabled applications, but maybe I am wrong & the "provides
> myspell-spellchecker" thing may be a good idea.
Well, you are seeing it from the "wrong side"; you maintain a
myspell-spellchecker enabled application and thinking from that side
(I do, too).
But what I am currently doing is thinking from the perspective of the
myspell-* dictionary packages for which it makes sense to recommend
the myspell-spellchecking-featured applications as much
as the ispell dictionaries depend on ispell. A Depends is superfluous
here since it then would install all 4 big packages which can't be the
sense ;)
Don't you think?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature