Re: Bug#224742 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...)
Scripsit John Lines <john@paladin.demon.co.uk>
> > except that ifupdown will complain if it happens to be the
> > empty string.
> If it did accept an empty string, and treat it as meaning false,
> like perl (for example) then I suspect this would lead to more
> confusion and bug reports.
Why should the empty string for a dummy parameter have any special
significanse?
--
Henning Makholm "I didn't even know you *could* kill chocolate ice-cream!"
Reply to: