Re: Proposed change to debian release system
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:38:39AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I'd like to propose some changes to the stable release policy (ps it would
> be nice if the policy is linked from http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/).
> I'd like for certain packages to be classed as "perishable", i.e. they
> become more or less useless with age. How packages should be classsed as
> such, I'm not 100% sure on yet (-devel+maintainer+SRM consenus, perhaps?),
> but to provide some examples:
> * spamassassin
> * snort
> could be considered perishable because their effectiveness is reduced over
> time. Such classed packages should be allowed to be updated in stable, I
> feel. Of course, it could be argued that any package is perishable, and thus
> this whole thing becomes a moot point...
SpamAssassin in unstable depends on a version of libhtml-parser-perl
more recent than the one in unstable.
I didn't find in your suggestion the paragraph that handles such
dependencies that might (if you upgrade libhtml-parser-perl in this
example) affect many hundreds unrelated packages.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed