NMUs still need NMU version numbering, right?
I've been seeing a lot of NMUs using regular (maintainer) version
Like libpalm-perl 1.3.0-3.
I thought they were supposed to use the next slot down in the number.
Like libpalm-perl 1.3.0-2.1.
This still applies to zero-day NMUs, BSPs, and so on, right?
(It does not apply when the package maintainer is the QA group,
firstname.lastname@example.org, so if you orphan a package and
change its maintainer to the QA group, you can use a regular maintainer
I'm asking because I find it convinient to be able to identify an NMU by
version number alone (so it's easy to see
whether a maintainer hasn't touched his package in a long time).