[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?



On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:20:07PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> That always struck me as a rather poor idea. What if we have two
> versions of a package, 1:1.0 and 2:1.0? Both will be foo_1.0_$ARCH.deb
> at the moment.

IIRC, the actual filename in the archive is

	foo_1.0-${EPOCH}%3a${DEBVER}_${ARCH}.deb.

-- 
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

Attachment: pgpe_m6aVb37d.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: