[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: exec-shield (maybe ITP kernel-patch-exec-shield)



Scripsit Zenaan Harkness <zen@iptaustralia.net>

> Absolutely. For some, the highest level of security is necesseary *right
> now*. Adamantix would be good fit for them

Well, if I was the slightest concerned about security I wouldn't for a
moment dream of running software from people with the stated goal of...

| I'm not in fact trying enlist volunteers. I try to offend as many
| Debian people as possible, so that they choose exec-shield. This to
| ensure that Adamantix will has an edge in security over Debian in
| the future. And it seems to be working very well so far.

<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00158.html>,


If somebody else were to investigate the software in question and
found that it did something useful and were willing to expand on his
findings rather than flaming those who ask, by all means we should
encourage that somebody to package it.

But this is obviously not such a someone.

-- 
Henning Makholm               "Hele toget raslede imens Sjælland fór forbi."



Reply to: