On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:08:16PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > And as I think I already mentionned several times, if we ship binaries > for a GPL'd, which cannot be rebuilt from the sources we ship, then > we're in violation of the GPL, since the binary obviously don't match > the sources. If we ship a new compiler that does optimisations slightly differently to the previous one, the binaries we built previously won't match the new compiler either. This isn't a reasonable argument, and wasting time worrying about it doesn't benefit our users even slightly. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review! -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda
Attachment:
pgp_IKObeklTO.pgp
Description: PGP signature