[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First pass all buildds before entering unstable



On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:02:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I don't think people would like it if their package stayed in incoming
> for multiple weeks because there's a backlog on some architecture.

Neither i. This is why i would like to receive baklogs mailed to maintainer if
autobuild fails. But i would like to receive backlogs even for pre-autobuilds,
so that i could fix the problem, contact the upstream etc.

BTW, i think that the correct workflow would be:
Move package from incoming to autobuild. If all architectures build, continue
(as before this change); else, if not builded but is not upstrea/maintainer
fault, continue (as before this change). Else reject the package.

> Unstable is there for that kind of things. And to detect other kinds of
> bugs, too. If you're going to keep packages in incoming like this,
> people won't be able to test it until it's built on all architectures.

If we stay as it is, we'll continue to get slowed by badly built
packages/softwares.

ciao,
-- 
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis              | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.               | something in common: they
local LANG="it_IT@euro"                     | don't depend on the language.

Attachment: pgpZeU5RjB7db.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: