[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:29:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > 1. I left package with 1.3.1 version with names: t1lib1, t1lib-dev,
> >    t1lib-doc, t1lib1-bin. Version 5.0.0 is uploaded with names: libt1-5,
> >    libt1-dev, libt1-doc, t1lib-bin.
> > 2. Dependant packages are modified and recompiled to use v5.0.0
> > 3. 1.3.1 is removed, we left with libt1-5, libt1-dev, libt1-doc and
> >    t1lib-bin, for users convenience empty t1lib-dev and t1lib-doc with
> >    dependencies only will be added.
> 2. Package t1lib 5.0.0 as source package t1lib, providing libt1-5,
>    libt1-dev, libt1-doc, and libt1-bin (or t1lib-bin -- Policy doesn't
>    suggest that you name this last item one way or the other).
> That's one way to go about this that should not require any
> pseudopackages.

Sorry, I oversold my proposal with that last statement.

Under my proposal you wouldn't need a pseudopackage for t1lib1, but you
would for:

t1lib-dev (Depends: libt1-dev)
t1lib-doc (Depends: libt1-doc)

and, if you choose to rename it:

t1lib-bin (Depends: libt1-bin)

G. Branden Robinson                |       Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       I met a man who wasn't there.
branden@debian.org                 |       He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |       I think he's from the CIA.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: