[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gimp1.2: gimp package suggest non-free software

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> a tapoté :

> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> reopen 220363
>> thanks
> Please do not abuse the BTS. If you want to discuss it, feel free to do
> so, but this is not a bug in the gimp package.

If you consider that not being a bug, please never claim that Debian
does not advertise non-free software -- yes, this claim was made
several times, but maybe not by you.
Because it clearly incitates users to put non-free is apt

>> Are you kidding?
>> Do you really think that I'm the only person to find UNACCEPTABLE that
>> a package in mail suggests packages in non-free, which ARE NOT PART OF
> As you're not a member of the Debian project, you don't get any say
> in what's to be accepted or not

Apparently you forget about a specific part of the Social Contract.

(Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software...)

> . And given that you appear to have a religious objection

Does this assertion have any ground?

> , there doesn't seem any point discussing this matter with you.

Sure, keep lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom,
there's no matter discussing that.

(I suppose that mozilla should advertise from macromedia website, at
this point).

Mathieu Roy

  | General Homepage: 		http://yeupou.coleumes.org/		|
  | Computing Homepage:		http://alberich.coleumes.org/  		|
  | Not a native english speaker:					|
  |	http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english 	|

Reply to: