[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:04:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:57:32PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > These arguments are good, but...
> > 
> > All packages which use this library depend on t1lib1. Of course, I can
> > provide dummy t1lib1 package which depends on libt1-1 but I do not like
> > this idea.
> I strongly urge you to overcome that dislike.  IMO a package should
> never disappear across a Debian release unless the functionality has
> gone missing.  

Agreed, so why rename it at all? (ie why t1lib -> libt1 if the dummy
package is always going to be required anyway).

> What's wrong with libt1-dev?  Do you expect to have to support
> development against multiple versions of t1lib?

Apparently so.

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to: