On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:47:09PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:22, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > All of the above seems pretty arbitrary. > > What do you consider to be the requirements for closing bugs? Should they be > fixed? Should they be tested? > > What do you consider the requirements for a bug to be submitted? That the > package has a bug? That the bug can be proven to be related to the Debian > packaging and not upstream? I've never found attempting to legislate things like this to be a worthwhile or effective activity. It's way too subjective. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature