Re: Closing bugs such as 210560
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:22, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> All of the above seems pretty arbitrary.
What do you consider to be the requirements for closing bugs? Should they be
fixed? Should they be tested?
What do you consider the requirements for a bug to be submitted? That the
package has a bug? That the bug can be proven to be related to the Debian
packaging and not upstream?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: