On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:46:36PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:54:39PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:46, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > In all fairness, I don't believe calc closed a bug he thought was still > > > > open - the bug log shows that he believed it was closed with the 3.1.4 > > > > upload. > > > > > > The messages related to the bug closing seem quite clear. They say that > > > bug reports through the Debian BTS will not be taken seriously and that > > > bug reporting should be done upstream. > > > > No it doesn't. > > "If it has not been fixed please do not reopen the bug in Debian BTS" > > Please explain your interpretation of the above quote then. When bugs are > closed without any testing or review and such a message is given, what > conclusion can possibly be drawn other than that the Debian maintainer does > not want any bug reports in the Debian BTS, and that such reports will not be > taken seriously? I interpret it as a request not to reopen the bug. I don't see where you're getting "If you do reopen the bug or file another similar one, it will not be taken seriously" from. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature