[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging sysfsutils: static library?



Hi!

On 2003-10-13 15:26 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>  >It is a separate upstream package.
> Then feel free to package it, as long as I keep udev I don't mind. :-)

Okay :-) We only have to get the dependencies right, as long as
libsysfs provides only a shared lib, udev should build-depend on it. I
will contact you when I switch to a shared library. Agreed?

> Back to the topic, I think you should discuss with the upstream author
> the reasons for having no shared library. If he is only waiting for a
> stable ABI then I think you should really keep the library static.

I sent a mail to upstream two days ago, but didn't receive an answer
yet. I will wait with uploading (or rather, looking for a sponsor)
until I get an answer or run out of patience (maybe after a week of
silence).

Have a nice day!

Martin

BTW: No need to CC me, I'm subscribed (see mail-followup-to).

-- 
Martin Pitt
home:  www.piware.de
eMail: martin@piware.de



Reply to: