Re: Packaging sysfsutils: static library?
On 2003-10-13 15:26 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >It is a separate upstream package.
> Then feel free to package it, as long as I keep udev I don't mind. :-)
Okay :-) We only have to get the dependencies right, as long as
libsysfs provides only a shared lib, udev should build-depend on it. I
will contact you when I switch to a shared library. Agreed?
> Back to the topic, I think you should discuss with the upstream author
> the reasons for having no shared library. If he is only waiting for a
> stable ABI then I think you should really keep the library static.
I sent a mail to upstream two days ago, but didn't receive an answer
yet. I will wait with uploading (or rather, looking for a sponsor)
until I get an answer or run out of patience (maybe after a week of
Have a nice day!
BTW: No need to CC me, I'm subscribed (see mail-followup-to).