also sprach Herbert Xu <email@example.com> [2003.09.28.0012 +0200]: > As I have said before, kernel-source's primary purpose is for > building default Debian kernel images. Thus it should contain all > the patches necessary so that the images are uniform across > architectures. IPsec is not necessary. > If someone wants to make a kernel-patch package out of it, go > right ahead. This is not responsible behaviour from a Debian maintainer, Herbert, and you know it. [...] > This is simply unmaintainable due to the complex relationships between > patches. So you offload the work to others... > In any case, the kernel-source package's README file should > contain all the information you need to extract any particular > patch that you're interested in. We are not interested in a patch, we are interested in feature backports being removed from kernel-source. Nowhere else does Debian have feature backports, the entire security update system is structured around the belief that this is *a bad thing*, and you are just being a incredibly difficult and non-cooperative about it. Are we going to need a formal vote to open your eyes? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: PGP signature