On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 12:08, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > >Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian > >Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images... > >but as for inclusion into the default source, still begs the question > >_why_ is it required, as your simple statement doesn't cover that. > If you want an unmodified kernel then download it from a kernel.org > mirror. Debian is supposed to ship an *useful* kernel. You seem to have missed my point. I did not and will not say UNMODIFIED. Get off overlooking the details I provide. If you cannot read then don't add to the noise.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part