On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:03:04AM +0100, David Pashley wrote: > On Sep 12, 2003 at 08:11, Ulrich Eckhardt praised the llamas by saying: > > I don't think that 3.1 is supposed to be binary compatible with 3.2, > > but I don't really know. I think that 3.2.2 is supposed to be > > compatible with 3.2.1 though. > > > As I understand it, 3.x should be binary compatible with any other 3.x > release. 4.x will not be binary compatible with 3.x. > Only in one direction, as the 3.2.0 release notes say: | The Qt version 3.2 series is binary compatible with the 3.1.x series. | Applications compiled for 3.1 will continue to run with 3.2. The FAQ gives some hints what (the trolls say) you can't do without breaking binary compatibility: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/technical.html#q411 Jan
Attachment:
pgpIYGN_WvTnP.pgp
Description: PGP signature