On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > AJ's requirement is fractionally stricter than policy's, but packages on > > which other packages pre-depend should be playing it safe anyway. I > > think that very much the same kind of care is needed to satisfy AJ's > > requirement and to satisfy policy. > Perhaps. But there _is_ a difference between the two and it turns > out to be important in the case I am investigating. I will follow > policy instead of the summary. Uh, no. Follow the behaviour of the tools, then the sarge rc bug policy, then the debian-policy document. Which case is this? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
Description: PGP signature