On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > AJ's requirement is fractionally stricter than policy's, but packages on
> > which other packages pre-depend should be playing it safe anyway. I
> > think that very much the same kind of care is needed to satisfy AJ's
> > requirement and to satisfy policy.
> Perhaps. But there _is_ a difference between the two and it turns
> out to be important in the case I am investigating. I will follow
> policy instead of the summary.
Uh, no. Follow the behaviour of the tools, then the sarge rc bug policy,
then the debian-policy document. Which case is this?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
Attachment:
pgptjxHYJ2vgf.pgp
Description: PGP signature