[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pre-Depends according to sarge_rc_policy.txt

On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > AJ's requirement is fractionally stricter than policy's, but packages on
> > which other packages pre-depend should be playing it safe anyway. I
> > think that very much the same kind of care is needed to satisfy AJ's
> > requirement and to satisfy policy.
> Perhaps.  But there _is_ a difference between the two and it turns
> out to be important in the case I am investigating.  I will follow
> policy instead of the summary.

Uh, no. Follow the behaviour of the tools, then the sarge rc bug policy,
then the debian-policy document. Which case is this?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

       ``Is this some kind of psych test?
                      Am I getting paid for this?''

Attachment: pgpVLDvPPQoPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: