Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, John Galt wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Fedor Zuev wrote:
>>On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>>Lack of forced distribution is not "censorship". Get a clue, or a
>>>dictionary.
>>
>> Heh.
>>
>> "Why that ugly, non-free GPL license demand from me to
>>distribute source code? Source would still be freely available from
>>the FSF website! Lack of forced distribution do not harm a
>>freedom!" Agree?
>>
>GPL, section 3c, says exactly that....
--------GPL v. 2----
3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms
of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the
following:
<...>
c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
-----------------------------------------------------------
received the program in object code or executable form with such
---------------------------------------------------------------
an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)
---------
---------------
Reply to: