Re: A possible GFDL compromise
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Fedor Zuev wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>>Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
>>> I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
>>>opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
>>>angrily demanded by you.
>
>>There's no censorship involved. *sigh* The GNU Manifesto would
>>still be freely available from the FSF website.
>
>>Lack of forced distribution is not "censorship". Get a clue, or a
>>dictionary.
>
> Heh.
>
> "Why that ugly, non-free GPL license demand from me to
>distribute source code? Source would still be freely available from
>the FSF website! Lack of forced distribution do not harm a
>freedom!" Agree?
>
GPL, section 3c, says exactly that....
>
>
>
- --
A computer without windoze is like a fish without a bicycle.
Who is John galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who. Finger me for PGP
public key.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQE/Sx14+ZSKG3nWr3ARAnVKAJ4lRg0pupSAQyTG4f8i5rIH9IHIsACg4Gsp
5jahoMmGjxxEWdADOKntN4U=
=zFjP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: