Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
>> I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
>>opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
>>angrily demanded by you.
>There's no censorship involved. *sigh* The GNU Manifesto would
>still be freely available from the FSF website.
>Lack of forced distribution is not "censorship". Get a clue, or a
>dictionary.
Heh.
"Why that ugly, non-free GPL license demand from me to
distribute source code? Source would still be freely available from
the FSF website! Lack of forced distribution do not harm a
freedom!" Agree?
Reply to: