[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: maintaining upstream snapshot package (was: Bits from the RM)



On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:14:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hah, and Mark Howard wants to remove galeon 1.3 from unstable since it
> is only a cvs snapshot because of what you said. I think maybe you want
> to clarify a bit more the experimental use and cvs snapshot thingy.

It's entirely appropriate for the maintainer to be making these decisions.

(Although downgrading galeon.deb from 1.3 to 1.2 or similar in unstable
would be awkward to manage well, involving epochs and probably some
dependency nastiness.)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

       ``Is this some kind of psych test?
                      Am I getting paid for this?''

Attachment: pgpa06O0mcWi3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: