[Followups set.] On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 03:21:00AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I'd say that you have your priorities wrong. If we decide that > documentation is not software then there is no reason to waste time to > figure out if the GFDL is DFSG-free or not. It's not within debian-legal's purview to attempt to answer one question; it is to attempt to answer the other. If you want "documentation" to be subjected to a different standard than "software" (whatever those are), then set about drafting that different standard. On debian-project. So far no one has managed to do it.[1] [1] draft a standard, *or* discuss this on the correct mailing list -- G. Branden Robinson | Freedom is kind of a hobby with me, Debian GNU/Linux | and I have disposable income that branden@debian.org | I'll spend to find out how to get http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | people more of it. -- Penn Jillette
Attachment:
pgpdxL19uG7er.pgp
Description: PGP signature