[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What doing with an uncooperative maintainer ?



* Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> wrote:
> IMO if we do not get answers, Ryan's ignorance implies a simple
> answer: Hijack this package!

Yes, as Ryan doesn't like NMUs, I decided to hijack gqview and
uploaded the new package to DELAYED/4-day.

Changes File attached, CC to BTS and Ryan.


Norbert

-- 
  .''`.
 : :' :    Norbert Tretkowski <nobse@debian.org>
 `. `'         Debian GNU/Linux Developer - http://www.debian.org/
   `-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:44:36 +0200
Source: gqview
Binary: gqview
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski <nobse@debian.org>
Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski <nobse@debian.org>
Description: 
 gqview     - simple image viewer
Closes: 196851 197734
Changes: 
 gqview (1.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainers (package hijack since it seems to be the only language
     that old maintainer understands).
   * New upstream release (closes: #197734):
     - Ported to gtk 2.2.
     - Exif sidebar.
     - Sort manager.
     - Additional translations.
     - Better keyboard support.
     - Bug fixes.
   * Compiled against libpng12 (closes: #196851).
   * Changed Recommends from gimp1.2 to gimp1.3.
   * Modified src/main.c to work with gimp1.3.
   * Modified Build-Depends for libgtk2.
   * Modified description in control file.
Files: 
 58b594b34d83bf88cef0c512abfb00d1 670 graphics optional gqview_1.3.2-1.dsc
 548279d3b45ff0a90a76334d14e4e4c6 962006 graphics optional gqview_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 48bbaaef34b967b78aa116afab740e5c 4183 graphics optional gqview_1.3.2-1.diff.gz
 5b9e0a1cc6883040351923901cd58286 560358 graphics optional gqview_1.3.2-1_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Qpsar/RnCw96jQERAukOAJ9Ou+M5tATW4LdKzwZuRT5y6gVQnQCfcaYH
nEBRh3lzKrjmD2jxyrfUt+s=
=oCA3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: