Re: What doing with an uncooperative maintainer ?
Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Stop being so hardheaded on the issue you perceive as the most imporant and
> try listening to what he's telling you.
You guys are telling that there is no reason to NMU, isn't it ? I'm not
the one who want to NMU this package, and I'm not talking about NMU.
I'm just saying that a maintainer should response to users, and avoid
letting an useless package be added to the archive because he doesn't
want to reponse to an other one (and it's *not* me).
Is there any other message that the no need of NMU, or the poor bug
importance stuff ?