Re: What doing with an uncooperative maintainer ?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:35:22PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:30:34PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> > I've tested both packages: gqview 1.3 has all 1.2 features, and add an
> > exif support. Many people use it for months without problems. I think
> > gqview 1.3 is ready for unstable ...
>
> Why would you NMU for a single wishlist bug? The above timeline doesn't
> point to any reason why it would be *necessary* to get the new version
> of gqview into the archive. Which of the bugs currently listed in the
> BTS are fixed by the new version of gqview?
Shouldn't that be: "Why would you NMU a package from a stable series
to a development series release for a single wishlist bug?"
dave...
Reply to: