Re: Ideas about allowing Co-maintainer
Le jeudi 14 août 2003, Andreas Barth écrit :
> * Nicolas Bertolissio (nico.bertol@free.fr) [030814 13:20]:
> > Le jeudi 14 août 2003, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt écrit :
> > > In most cases, this "accepted way" leads to no change in the package and
> > > is only frustrating for the submitter of the patch and Goswin's proposal
> > > addresses such cases. I like the idea a lot [1] and am sure that this
> > > will improve the overall quality of Debian.
>
> > An NMU can then be done if the package maintainer does not answer to
> > this patch. So you don't need to have a co-maintainer, you just have to
> > make a NMU, which is just what the new co-maintainer would do.
>
> Would you sponsor Marc, Goswin or myself for a NMU? Would you sponsor
> for a co-maintainer upload? That's the important difference.
No because I'm not a DD ;)
Sorry, maybe I missed something, but what is the difference for the
sponsor?
Regards
Nicolas
--
Reply to: