On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:53:46 -0500, Steve Langasek > <vorlon@netexpress.net> wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 06:12:40PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > >> I would love to see the installator's decision to use md5 passwords to > >> be honored during the foo => sarge upgrade. Are there already plans to > >> establish a mechanism to allow this? > >Yes, there are plans to add a set of new, non-conffile config files into > >the PAM setup which will contain "common" module settings that can be > >included from other service-specific conffiles using the (apparently > >Debian-specific) "@include" syntax. I intend for this to be resolved > >prior to sarge's release; > Will there be a smooth upgrade path from potato/woody, or will manual > intervention be necessary? Oh, well, I guess that depends on how good of a job we do; but certainly, the goal is to provide a smooth upgrade path. > In which PAM files do I need to write md5 clauses to have md5 > passwords used everywhere? Is there more like the three files I > originally mentioned? By the time we're done, /etc/pam.d/other should be the only file that this particular change would need to be made to. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpRln39IQXlw.pgp
Description: PGP signature